Sorry, but I’m likely to vote Yes. The fund managers may be sloppy, but I grew up in an era when no one even acknowledged such problems existed( & so now the least I can do is support families that suffer (even at the cost of extra taxes). I’ll skip that sports game instead.
Sorry, but I’m likely to vote Yes. The fund managers may be sloppy, but I grew up in an era when no one even acknowledged such problems existed( & so now the least I can do is support families that suffer (even at the cost of extra taxes). I’ll skip that sports game instead.
We keep rewarding bad leadership
https://theangryohioan.substack.com/p/the-cleveland-browns-and-our-addiction
I agree, but getting rid of them via elections sounds better than getting rid of the program
Voting No doesnt get rid of the program. It just doesnt give them more money. The program will have the same funding that was passed in 2005.
Yes, but it will, I fear, significantly reduce the program thanks to inflation