Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jesse Berezovsky's avatar

It's hard to take any of your arguments about levies seriously when you make no mention of the impact of HB920.

For those that don't know, Ohio is one of several states that fixes the dollar amount collected from a levy passed by the voters. That means that if we passed a levy 10 years ago for X dollars, the income from that levy today is still X dollars, even though assessed property values and costs have all risen dramatically in that time.

So things that are funded by voted property tax levies get no "cost of living" increase over time, unless we vote to give them one with new levies.

That's not to say we should automatically vote for every levy. But the things I would want to know are like, how has the organization's budget changed over time, adjusted for inflation? Is the new levy effectively just a cost-of-living increase, or is it more than that? Is there evidence that the organization has been significantly wasteful, or has its need for property tax revenue gone down for some reason? Or would a "no" vote on the levy be a vote to effectively cut services?

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?